<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter Won&#8217;t Endure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mvalente.eu/2010/03/03/why-twitter-wont-endure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mvalente.eu/2010/03/03/why-twitter-wont-endure/</link>
	<description>Heavy Mental Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: osiris</title>
		<link>http://mvalente.eu/2010/03/03/why-twitter-wont-endure/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>osiris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvalente.eu/?p=1164#comment-988</guid>
		<description>gaahh, there were some typos...

&quot;MMS and useless&quot; shoud read &quot;MMS are useless&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gaahh, there were some typos&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;MMS and useless&#8221; shoud read &#8220;MMS are useless&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osiris</title>
		<link>http://mvalente.eu/2010/03/03/why-twitter-wont-endure/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>osiris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvalente.eu/?p=1164#comment-987</guid>
		<description>twitter is just (as of now) a badly implmented form of IRC made, probably, by people who never used IRC.

either way i think that even SMS will be soon dead. i mean, it should be dead already. just like plain phonecalls, plain radio or plain tv.
it should be all data. SMS and phone calls (with/without video) should be replaced by XMPP, MMS and useless when there is email with attachements, radio by audio feeds, tv by video feeds, live and/or recorded, by demand and/or not-by-demand (classic tv style).

of course this was obvious 5 (maybe more) years ago. i&#039;m seeing improvements but still there are some pieces missing for the puzzle to be complete.

with some work one can complete the puzzle at home but it&#039;s not yet &quot;boxed&quot;  for the joe user. 

hmm...do i hear &quot;business model&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter is just (as of now) a badly implmented form of IRC made, probably, by people who never used IRC.</p>
<p>either way i think that even SMS will be soon dead. i mean, it should be dead already. just like plain phonecalls, plain radio or plain tv.<br />
it should be all data. SMS and phone calls (with/without video) should be replaced by XMPP, MMS and useless when there is email with attachements, radio by audio feeds, tv by video feeds, live and/or recorded, by demand and/or not-by-demand (classic tv style).</p>
<p>of course this was obvious 5 (maybe more) years ago. i&#8217;m seeing improvements but still there are some pieces missing for the puzzle to be complete.</p>
<p>with some work one can complete the puzzle at home but it&#8217;s not yet &#8220;boxed&#8221;  for the joe user. </p>
<p>hmm&#8230;do i hear &#8220;business model&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvalente</title>
		<link>http://mvalente.eu/2010/03/03/why-twitter-wont-endure/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>mvalente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvalente.eu/?p=1164#comment-979</guid>
		<description>&gt;what about SMS?
&gt;I think that Twitter has the potential to replace it. 
&gt;

   It hasnt. SMS services is a distributed/decentralized system. It
 isnt provided by a single operator. Thats what will happen to
 Twitter, it&#039;ll be one of many services interconnected through
 some standard (whether open or proprietary). Open will win in
 the end.


&gt;Skype can also replace phone calls..

  So can Google Voice, Apple&#039;s iChat, VoipBuster, JahJah and several others. Once again, its a distributed system that is (in
 part and eventually wholly) distributed and decentralized.

&gt;Mobile companies will only sell internet access the same way &gt;that Land Telephone companies sell TV nowadays
&gt;

   Land phone companies are selling TV channels, voice services and Internet. Mobile companies will follow. They&#039;ll still sell services like SMS. With it being decentralized. Actually, phone companies would/will be the major interested in having a decentralized distributed twitter-like system, interconnected through open standars. Thats the only way that they&#039;ll defuse twitter&#039;s threat.

   -- MV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;what about SMS?<br />
&gt;I think that Twitter has the potential to replace it.<br />
&gt;</p>
<p>   It hasnt. SMS services is a distributed/decentralized system. It<br />
 isnt provided by a single operator. Thats what will happen to<br />
 Twitter, it&#8217;ll be one of many services interconnected through<br />
 some standard (whether open or proprietary). Open will win in<br />
 the end.</p>
<p>&gt;Skype can also replace phone calls..</p>
<p>  So can Google Voice, Apple&#8217;s iChat, VoipBuster, JahJah and several others. Once again, its a distributed system that is (in<br />
 part and eventually wholly) distributed and decentralized.</p>
<p>&gt;Mobile companies will only sell internet access the same way &gt;that Land Telephone companies sell TV nowadays<br />
&gt;</p>
<p>   Land phone companies are selling TV channels, voice services and Internet. Mobile companies will follow. They&#8217;ll still sell services like SMS. With it being decentralized. Actually, phone companies would/will be the major interested in having a decentralized distributed twitter-like system, interconnected through open standars. Thats the only way that they&#8217;ll defuse twitter&#8217;s threat.</p>
<p>   &#8212; MV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francisco Costa</title>
		<link>http://mvalente.eu/2010/03/03/why-twitter-wont-endure/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mvalente.eu/?p=1164#comment-978</guid>
		<description>what about SMS? 
I think that Twitter has the potential to replace it. Skype  can also replace phone calls..
Mobile companies will only sell internet access the same way that Land Telephone companies sell TV nowadays</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about SMS?<br />
I think that Twitter has the potential to replace it. Skype  can also replace phone calls..<br />
Mobile companies will only sell internet access the same way that Land Telephone companies sell TV nowadays</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

